请教一下，哪一位能人义士能帮我翻译一下呢，非常感谢

Introduction to "balance" on the impact of China's banking industry

Abstract: with the alibaba launched in June 17 "balance", the balance of this new value-added model, netizens are predicted to finance an earthquake's going to happen, a lot of people think balance treasure will cause serious impact for the traditional banking, visible jack ma, the influence of this action. Balance of treasure for the impact of the banking industry is the result of it is higher than the deposit interest rates and lower than the risk of financial products, it does not have the minimum amount of purchase, can turn into a at any time. More important is to achieve the "lazy", need not run Banks get complicated formalities, just in front of the computer easy operation. But also some people think that the balance is not treasure bank deposits, no liquid deposits, and its interest or no more than two year period of time deposits is high, and there is a certain risk, so for the impact of the banking industry co., LTD. This paper practical problems through balance treasure the increment model, using the knowledge of the financial industry analysis of the status quo of China's banking industry to the balance and contrast, China's banking industry and to balance the treasure to the impact of China's banking industry to do analysis and put forward personal finance advice, to resolve the common concerns.

Keywords: balance treasure, increment model, banking, liquidity, financial management, impact.

摘 要 ：互联网金融和金融互联网是目前包括我国在内的市场经济体的新兴业态，越来越多的金融产品创新发生，并且不断冲击着原有的金融监管体系和互联网社会。以华尔街为代表的金融行业从业者不断地创造出适应于社会发展需要、投资者需求的各种各样的金融产品。当世界进入到互联网时代之后，乘着互联网技术的东风，互联网金融蓬勃发展起来。互联网金融可以泛指一切运用互联网技术、运用互联网虚拟社区来实现传统资金中介作用的行为。就我国来说，互联网金融的创新主要出现在以下领域：第一，支付方式；第二，金融产品；第三，产品销售渠道；第四，金融机构本身。相比较传统金融行业来说，互联网金融的风险体现在三个方面：第一，互联网金融监管的发展无法跟上互联网金融的发展脚步；第二，互联网金融风险与传统金融机构相比只多不少；第三，中国的金融市场化程度较低，互联网金融向纵深发展的动力不足。而我国目前面临着传统金融监管效率不高，互联网金融监管盲点颇多的尴尬局面。为此应当建立起以兼顾效率与公平、安全；兼顾市场与国家；兼顾金融因素与互联网因素；借鉴成熟监管经验；严守监管底线思维等原则，设置互联网金融监管的具体规则。余额宝——作为我国目前最新、最火热的`互联网金融创新，其法律性质应当是一种新型的互联网基金。余额宝改写了中国基金业的发展方向，改变了金融产品的销售方式和功能内容，并且给传统金融业注入互联网因素。所以尽管余额宝还面临着货币基金的市场风险、互联网的安全风险等等一系列风险，但是我们还是应该要宽容、甚至扶持它的发展。为此，应当设置适用于余额宝的存款保险制度；纳入金融消费者权益保护基金；选择备付金银行，计提风险准备金，并且同时需要加强我国社会信用管理体系 。本文除引言与结语外共分四章。

第一章论述了金融创新和互联网之间的关系，主要论述了互联网成为了金融创新的一个加速器，互联网也是金融发展的一个全新领域。通过互联网技术和互联网思维，金融创新可以独立于传统的金融行业发生。主要论述了金融创新的概念和特点以及互联网金融的特征和互联网金融的参与主体。值得注意的是互联网金融参与的主体应当进行划分，主要区分为三类：从事互联网金融的互联网企业，从事互联网金融的金融企业以及从事互联网金融的互联网金融企业。

第二章论述了中国的互联网金融的现状，包括互联网金融创新的模式归纳、互联网金融的风险特征，以及监管的一般理论和国外经验。本章节重点论述了互联网金融的风险特征，这些特征构成了我国互联网金融监管的特定对象。

第三章论述了我国目前的互联网金融监管的体系，重点分析了我国目前的法律困境与制度障碍、现阶段金融监管现状，提出我国建立互联网金融监管机制的五大原则和具体机制设计。

最后一个章以余额宝的发展现状和监管作为内容，主要考察了余额宝的发展历程和法律属性，通过对于余额宝创新能力的分析，结合上文论述的互联网金融监管体制的具体构建，提出了余额宝的法律规制建议。

关键词： 互联网 金融创新 监管 法律规制

Abstract

Internet of Finance is a new industry among the world including China. A large numberof financial products have occurred through financial innovation, and have begun to impactthe existing financial regulatory system and all the Internet community. Wall Street, therepresentative of the financial industry, constantly create these wide ranges of financialproducts for the demands of investors and improve the social development. When the worldgoes into the age of the Internet, the Internet of Finance flourishes. Internet of Finance meansevery action which can play the role of financial intermediary through Internet technology. InChina, there are four kinds of Internet of Finance: the method of paymentthe financialproductsproduct sales channelsthe financial institutions themselves. Compared totraditional financial industry, the risks of Internet of Finance lie in those fields: first, theregulatory can’t keep up with the pace of Internet of FinanceSecond , the Internet of Financerisks are bigger than traditional onesthird, the development in China is slow. The country iscurrently facing the dilemma which means traditional financial regulatory is not so effective,and there is a vacuum of Internet of Finance regulatory. In order to end this situation, weshould build a regulatory system, based on the principles including efficiency and fairness,safety, bottom line of thinking, etc.

Yu E Bao, a money-market fund promoted by Alipay rewrites the development directionof China's fund industry, changes the way of financial products sales, and injects Internetfactors into the traditional financial sector. We should take it more carefully and make aseries of regulatory which includes some details and some kind of Macro regulations.

In addition to this introduction and conclusion altogether is divided four chapters.

The first chapter discusses the relationship between financial innovation and the Internet,mainly discusses the Internet becomes an accelerator of financial innovation, a new field inthe Internet is financial development. Through the Internet technology and Internet thinking,financial innovation can be independent of the traditional financial industry. Mainly discussesthe concept and characteristics of financial innovation and financial characteristics of theInternet and the Internet financial participation main body. Notable is the subject of Internetfinancial participation should be divided, divided into three major categories: engaged inInternet Financial Internet enterprise, engaged in Internet financial financial enterprises andengaged in Internet Financial Internet financial enterprises.

The second second chapter discusses the Chinese Internet financial status, riskcharacteristics, including the Internet financial innovation pattern of Internet financialsupervision, as well as the general theory and foreign experience. This chapter mainlydiscusses the risk characteristics of the Internet financial, the characteristics of the particularobject of Internet financial supervision in china.

The third chapter discusses China's current Internet financial supervision system,analyzes the legal dilemma and institutional obstacles, the present financial supervision, putsforward five principles of design to establish the Internet financial supervision mechanism ofour country and the specific mechanism.

The last chapter in the development and regulation of balance treasure as content,mainly inspects the development process and legal attribute of balance treasure, through theanalysis of balance treasure innovation ability, combining the concrete construction discussedabove Internet financial supervision system, puts forward suggestions of legal regulation ofbalance treasure.

Keywords: Internet Financial innovation Supervision Legal supervision

目 录

摘 要

Abstract

1 引 言

1.1 选题背景和研究意义

1.1.1 选题背景

1.1.2 研究意义

1.2 国内外研究现状

1.2.1 国内研究现状

1.2.2 国外研究现状

1.3 研究方法及创新点

1.3.1 研究方法和思路

1.3.2 本文可能的创新点

2 金融创新和互联网金融

2.1 金融创新概述

2.1.1 金融创新的概念

2.1.2 金融创新的特点

2.1.3 创新金融产品的财产性质

2.2 互联网金融概述

2.2.1 互联网金融的概念

2.2.2 互联网金融的参与主体

2.2.3 互联网金融与传统金融的区别

3 我国的互联网金融

3.1 互联网创新的模式

3.1.1 支付方式

3.1.2 金融产品

3.1.3 营销渠道

3.1.4 金融机构

3.2 我国互联网金融的风险特征

3.2.1 互联网金融监管无法跟上互联网金融的发展

3.2.2 互联网金融风险比传统金融机构更大

3.2.3 互联网金融向纵深发展的动力不足

3.3 金融监管一般理论

3.3.1 创新和监管的竞赛关系

3.3.2 监管的外国经验——来自东西方的版本

4 我国互联网金融监管体系的构建

4.1 法律困境与制度障碍

4.1.1 互联网金融的安全问题既是基本问题也是复杂问题

4.1.2 互联网金融的金融问题是核心问题也是最难以解决的问题

4.2 我国金融监管现状

4.2.1 互联网金融创新模仿痕迹明显

4.2.2 金融创新监管机制对金融创新回应慢

4.2.3 金融监管机制的发展不够成熟

4.3 监管原则

4.3.1 兼顾效率与公平、安全

4.3.2 兼顾市场与国家

4.3.3 兼顾金融因素与互联网因素

4.3.4 借鉴成熟监管经验

4.3.5 严守监管底线

4.4 监管机制的具体内容

4.4.1 主体监管机制

4.4.2 辅助监管机制

5 余额宝创新的法律规制

5.1 余额宝的法律属性

5.1.1 余额宝的发展历程

5.1.2 余额宝的特点

5.1.3 余额宝的法律关系

5.2 余额宝的创新价值

5.2.1 余额宝改写了中国基金业的发展方向

5.2.2 余额宝改变了金融产品的销售方式和功能

5.2.3 余额宝给传统金融业注入互联网因素

5.3 余额宝的法律规制

5.3.1 余额宝的风险

5.3.2 余额宝法律监管的必要性

5.3.3 美国的“余额宝”监管模式借鉴

5.3.4 我国余额宝法律规制的建议

结 论

参考文献

全球领先的企业云计算平台百会最近也发布了一款全新的sem优化工具——百会搜索赢家。有别市面上的自动竞价调词优化软件，百会搜索赢家是国内首款以销售结果为评估依据的SEM优化工具。也就是说，有别于其他前端优化的SEM工具，百会搜索赢家专注于后端优化，清晰、准确的告诉您投入产出比及帮助您管理好你花钱买来的客户，让企业在搜索引擎上以更低的成本获取更大的收益，实现在搜索引擎上持续有效的回报。由于搜索赢家集成了百会CRM，因此：1、搜索引擎投放之外的其它市场活动效果，也可以用搜索赢家来追踪。2、企业通过搜索引擎投放以外的方式获得的客户，也可以用搜索赢家来管理。现在起访问百会官网可以免费试用百会“搜索赢家”。

---